This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1538513209338902v1 8/3/248    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hirt, S. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Premodern, Modern, Postmodern? Placing New Urbanism into a Historical Perspective

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

This study explores New Urbanism as part of a contemporary cultural paradigm referred to as postmodernism. By highlighting the complex relationship between New Urbanist design prescriptions and earlier urban development approaches from the premodern and modern periods, I reflect on some seemingly paradoxical aspects of both New Urbanism and postmodernism. Specifically, I argue that whereas New Urbanism rejects the key design tenets of modernist planning and strives to revive premodern urban forms (and in this sense qualifies as "postmodern"), it contradicts one of the foundational premises of postmodern thought—the commitment to pluralism. I further argue that this contradiction relates to a fundamental challenge facing New Urbanists planners: how to achieve premodern urban design ideals within the economic and technological conditions of contemporary society. I illustrate these themes and contradictions with examples of historic and recent planning in the Cleveland region.

Key Words: New Urbanism • modernism • postmodernism • Cleveland

This version was published on August 1, 2009

Journal of Planning History, Vol. 8, No. 3, 248-273 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1538513209338902


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?